Waferpedia

Tokyo Electron

Expedius

Provisional entry — research in progress

This page was generated automatically from cited public sources and hasn't completed the full research pass yet. Every specification shown carries its source; more detail is added as research completes.

Expedius — Inventory photo
Fig. 01ExpediusInventory photo[1]

How it works

The Expedius is based on the CLEAN TRACK MARK 7 platform, which provides a non-vacuum wafer transfer capability.[2]

The machine uses unique brushes and mechanical chuck to clean both sides of the wafer on a carrier-to-carrier basis.[2]

Applications

The brush cleaning capability can be expanded with high-pressure jet spray or megasonic cleaning options.[2]

What do the numbers mean?

Vacuum & pumping5

Transfer system
Vacuumless robotic transport[2]
Accurate?
Chuck type
Mechanical and vacuum chucks[2]
Accurate?
Brush pressure control
Automatic brush pressure controller[2]
Accurate?
Optional cleaning modules
High-pressure jet spray or megasonic clean[2]
Accurate?
Wafer transfer
non-vacuum wafer transfer capability[2]
Accurate?

Wafer handling4

Wafer size capability
5 to 8 inches[2]
Accurate?
Cleaning capability
Both sides of wafer[2]
Accurate?
Wafer capability
5 inch to 8 inch[2]
Accurate?
Cleaning capability
cleaning both sides of the wafer[2]
Accurate?

Control & software1

Interface
SMIF interface[2]
Accurate?

Configuration & options7

single block[1]
Accurate?
Platform
CLEAN TRACK MARK 7[2]
Accurate?
Host communication
GEM host communication[2]
Accurate?
Compliance
S2-93 and CE mark[2]
Accurate?
OEM
Tokyo Electron[1]
Accurate?
Model
Expedius[1]
Accurate?
Equipment type
Wet Bench[1]
Accurate?
Interested in this tool?
Need help with this tool?Embed spec card

What does it need to run?

Site utility requirements, footprint, and infrastructure needed to install and operate this tool. Sourced from public records.

  • Transfer systemVacuumless robotic transport[2]
  • Chuck typeMechanical and vacuum chucks[2]
  • Brush pressure controlAutomatic brush pressure controller[2]
  • Optional cleaning modulesHigh-pressure jet spray or megasonic clean[2]
  • Wafer transfernon-vacuum wafer transfer capability[2]

Where are the manuals?

Generated from public-source data on file. Enter your email to access — nothing is published; details are routed privately.

Not publicly documented

Field notes

No research found yet — worked with this tool? Share what you know.

Worked with this tool? Help preserve its knowledge →

Frequently asked questions

What are the typical throughput and footprint considerations for such systems?General reference — not yet source-verified

Throughput depends on the number of process chambers and the recipe time per wafer. Single-wafer tools generally have lower throughput than batch tools but offer better process control. Footprint is moderate; systems are often arranged in a cluster configuration with multiple chambers sharing a central wafer handler. Space for chemical cabinets and plumbing must also be included in the fab layout.

How do these systems handle chemical waste and environmental safety?General reference — not yet source-verified

Wet processing systems are designed with integrated drain systems to collect spent chemicals and rinse water. Many incorporate point‑of‑use filtration and on‑line chemical blending to reduce waste. Exhaust systems remove volatile vapors. Safety features include chemical sensors, leak detection, interlock doors, and emergency shutdown. The tool itself must be placed in a corrosive‑resistant environment with appropriate ventilation.

What maintenance and consumables are required for reliable operation?General reference — not yet source-verified

Regular maintenance includes replacement of chemical filters, o‑rings, seals, and cleaning of nozzles and drain lines. Consumables include chemical containers (drums or bottles), deionized water, and drying gases such as nitrogen. The spin chuck and associated robotics may require periodic calibration and cleaning. Preventive maintenance schedules are critical to avoid particle generation and chemical cross‑contamination.

Not publicly documented

The following facts about the Expedius are absent from this record as of this revision. First-hand knowledge or a citation closes a gap; every submission is reviewed before publication.

  • No publicly documented production dates or lifecycle milestones (introduction, end of production, EOL) for the Expedius are on record.

    Answerable by: OEM historical records or a trade-press announcement

  • No publicly documented variants, configuration options, or revision breakpoints of the Expedius are on record.

    Answerable by: an OEM product catalog or an engineer who ordered or specified the tool

  • The control-system platform and OS era of the Expedius are not on record.

    Answerable by: an engineer who operated it or OEM installation records

  • No publicly documented failure modes or field errata for the Expedius are on record.

    Answerable by: a field service engineer, process engineer, or maintenance technician

  • The process node or technology generation of the Expedius is not on record.

    Answerable by: an OEM datasheet or a fab qualification report

No research found yet — worked with this tool? Share what you know.

Sources & citations

Sources (2)Every fact above is drawn from these public sources
  1. [1]Inventory photo
  2. [2]web.archive.org — tel.com (Apr 14, 2005)web.archive.org
Was this page accurate?

Last updated Oct 3, 2026.

Compare with similar tools

View all →